Calling an audience a community
People consume content but do not participate or feel responsible for the group.
Do instead: Create roles, rituals and ways to contribute.
Mirja Schwartz · Community Strategy Expert
Based on the episode Episode 003 · Community Marketing: Building Belonging Over TimeUse this guide to understand the episode's core idea, see when it applies and translate it into better marketing decisions.
Many brands call an audience a community before they have built the conditions for participation.
People consume the brand, but rarely participate with each other.
The community promise is clearer in copy than in actual member behaviour.
There are values, but no repeatable rituals that make them felt.
If two checks fit, read the guide below and use the notes to sharpen your next decision.
Read the ideas in sequence. Open a section when you want the practical implication behind the principle.
An audience is a group of people who receive your content. A community is a group of people who feel they belong: to each other, to a shared purpose, to a common direction.
An audience consumes. A community participates. An audience tolerates being interrupted. A community shows up without being asked.
Most brands have audiences and call them communities. The shift from one to the other requires a qualitative change in how you design your engagement. From broadcasting to creating structures for participation, co-creation, and shared voice. This is a slower, harder path than growing a follower count. It is also significantly more durable.
Mirja defines community through belonging and participation, not audience size. Her point is that the common marketing KPIs miss the deeper question: can people participate, co-create, grow and feel that they are part of something shared?
The most common failure mode Mirja observes when working with brands: they cannot clearly describe what they stand for. Team members use different words. The founder's vision has never been translated into language others can share. The values listed on the website have never been tested against real decisions.
Before you can build external community, you need internal clarity. What is the vision? What is the narrative? What are you asking others to connect with? Without that, community-building efforts are built on sand. External community reflects internal culture.
Starting from within comes from her values critique. Values written on a guideline page mean little unless people can feel, see and experience them, and she says many teams struggle to describe the vision or mission their community would gather around.
Community is built around shared interest, shared vision, or shared values. Not around demographic profiles.
The people who become the core of a brand's community are not necessarily the people who buy the most product. They are the people who see themselves in the brand's narrative and want to be part of where it is going. Seth Godin's framing: "people like us do things like this." The community is self-selecting around the idea, not the product.
The invitation to community must be articulated at the level of the idea, not the feature or the demographic.
Common ground is different from a demographic target group. Mirja connects it to people who share a vision, see personal growth, seek inspiration or recognise themselves in how a brand behaves, whether or not they are immediate customers.
Mirja's most practical principle: a healthy community is porous in both directions.
Inside-out means sharing your perspective, process, vision, and culture with the world, not as marketing, but as genuine transparency. Outside-in means actively inviting perspectives and ideas from outside your bubble into your organisation.
Communities that are only inside-out become echo chambers. Communities that are only outside-in lose direction. The balance keeps the brand fresh, grounded, and genuinely in dialogue with the people it claims to serve.
The inside-out and outside-in idea is about exchange. Brands need to share what is inside the organisation while letting trends, impulses and people from outside their usual bubble shape what the community becomes.
A community does not run itself. It requires deliberate role design.
Mirja identifies several roles that need to be actively filled. Community managers who tend to relationships and maintain the container. Connectors who are naturally skilled at bringing people together. Creators who contribute content, ideas, or work that feeds the community's shared interest. Champions: your most passionate members, who would advocate for you without incentive.
Identifying these roles and finding people to fill them is one of the most important operational investments in community building.
Roles are not limited to a social media community manager. Mirja names ambassadors, creators, connectors, people who make room for exchange and people who help build the structures where participation can happen.
Online platforms enable scale. They allow a community to stay connected across time zones, maintain low-friction touchpoints, and grow beyond what any physical gathering could reach. But the deepest community bonds form in person.
The moments that create genuine belonging happen in the same room. Trust is built there. Real co-creation happens there. The experiences that make belonging feel real are physical.
Mirja's recommendation: digital for finding people and maintaining connection. Physical for creating the experiences that make belonging real. And both consistently. A one-off event creates energy, not community. A regular rhythm of interaction creates the continuity that community requires.
Online channels can create reach, but Mirja warns that deeper participation usually needs other formats. A community rhythm might include recurring online contact and occasional real-life gatherings; the point is consistency, not a one-off event.
Community is not built. It is attracted.
Use these notes when the audience exists, but the conditions for belonging are still fragile.
People consume content but do not participate or feel responsible for the group.
Do instead: Create roles, rituals and ways to contribute.
The invitation feels vague because the organisation cannot express its own purpose.
Do instead: Write the internal vision and shared values first.
Members read the values but never encounter them in behaviour.
Do instead: Turn each value into a repeatable action or ritual.
Reach grows, but belonging stays shallow.
Do instead: Use digital for breadth and in-person moments for depth.
This guide follows the sequence of ideas from the episode, so the implementation notes stay connected to the guest's logic.